What this site is for
It exists to separate what is established about platelet-rich plasma from what is claimed, and to grade each honestly rather than dismissing a point-of-care preparation or endorsing it. That is why every claim is placed in one of four groups, why the variability of the preparation is treated as a central fact, and why the hair-loss evidence is described as the strongest in the group and as mixed in the same sentence.
What it deliberately does not do
It does not recommend for or against a treatment, and it does not invite a reader toward an assessment or a consultation. It is not a booking page and it offers no service in relation to anything it describes. It names no kit, device or manufacturer, quotes no prices, and does not present a point-of-care preparation as equivalent to a defined product or as an equal partner in a combination.
The facts kept visible
Three facts are repeated wherever they are relevant. There is no cosmetic approval, because a preparation made at the point of care is a process rather than a product. The concentration depends on the protocol and is not comparable between clinics. And the material is reabsorbed, so a lasting change in shape is not what it provides.
How the content is reviewed and corrected
Ke He, MD, Deputy Director and Head of Skin & Laser Aesthetics, is the responsible physician. This subject moves on a faster clock than most, because kits and protocols change more often than the evidence about them is renewed, so the review is dated and revisited on a short cycle. If you find something unclear, out of date or wrong, the contact page explains how to tell us, and the correction is made to the page itself.